www.ExactingEditor.com/Reviews-by-Loyd.html
Seven Reviews in 1,400
Words
by Chris Loyd (first installment)
Authors spotlighted: I. I. Gitelson, G. M. Lisovsky, and R. D. MacElroy; Robert
V. Hogg and Elliot A. Tanis; China Miéville;
Charles Murray; Henry M. (“Hank”) Paulson; and Nate Silver
Chris Loyd is a
mission-support scientist at the This page offers Loyd’s
take on contemporary books. After the founding e-mail exchange, we opted to add
categorical shorthand: COHERENCE (letter grade), READABILITY, IN A WORD, and IN
A PHRASE.
Our shorthand also includes a factor nearly all reviewers overlook: WHO NEEDS
THIS BOOK. That’s not a dismissal, either. The point is to discern, in each
case, the logical audience or market. Quite often it’s a group the author was
hardly thinking about.
We thank you for tuning
in (and, to appreciate how this page bypasses the complications that have come
to plague Amazon, see
www.ExactingEditor.com/Phony-Reviews.html). This page has its roots
in a casual question. I e-mailed: “What book has made the biggest
positive/productive impression on you this past year?” Chris replied with short
reviews that I knew deserved a wider audience. --
Frank Gregorsky, August 2013
|
(1) For the category of "most useful", the book is
Probability and Statistical Inference
by Robert V. Hogg and Elliot A. Tanis. Yes, it's a college textbook.
Knowing how to calculate standard deviations, sample
variances, and do hypothesis testing are all very, very useful. It will enable
you to shrug your shoulders at many science reports. There are concepts
discussed in popular physics, mostly quantum mechanics, that are metaphors about
mathematical artifacts.
Probability is the mathematics of uncertainty. Statistics are
functions (mathematical operations) of sample observations. When you understand
that uncertainty can be mathematically analyzed, the mystery of it lessens. When
you understand that in order to decrease uncertainty, you need huge sample
sizes, you can understand why some scientific studies appear contradictory. Not
just due to bad experiment design, but because of puny sample sizes.
_____________________________________________________________
(2) For "biggest smile/most thrilling”, the
McGraw-Hill Concise Encyclopedia of Environmental
Science. Seriously. This book is fun to read (except for the
entries on insects -- they are only somewhat interesting). The downside is that
the information density per paragraph is so exhausting that getting through the
A's took a lot of effort.
Since different authors wrote their own respective
paragraphs, the tone of each entry can vary. Fortunately, some of the authors
had a sense of humor. Consider the first and last sentence of the following
paragraph:
"By the
Middle Pennsylvanian, a massive radiation of reptiles was in process. The most
prominent reptiles belong in the Diapsida: dinosaurs, lizards and snakes, and
pterosaurs (flying reptiles). The birds, Aves, which diverged from the dinosaur
radiation in the Late Triassic or Early Jurassic, are considered to be feathered
dinosaurs, and thus members of the Diapsida, whereas older authorities prefer to
treat them as a separate case. In addition, there were several Mesozoic
radiations of marine reptiles such as ichthyosaurs and plesiosaurs. Turtles (Chelonia)
first appeared in the Triassic and have been highly successful ever since" (from
page 39, entry: "Animal Evolution").
_____________________________________________________________
(3) For "book that I can only read parts of on Google Books,
because it costs over $100", Man-Made Closed
Ecological Systems by I. I. Gitelson, G. M. Lisovsky, and R. D.
MacElroy.
Pretty much the definitive text on closed-loop systems.
Discusses various experiments, going back to the 1950s. It has chapters like
"The Earth's Biosphere as a Closed Ecosystem" and "The Human Component in a
Closed Ecosystem". This book is unique in that its authors are passionate and
detailed, but don't have a lot of the political or mystical garbage that is
too-often associated with anything "ecological".
Gitelson and Lisovsky are both Russian, so they talk a lot on
Russian history and themes related to ecosystems -- namely, concepts like the "noosphere".
It's abstract, and likely nonsense, but fortunately it seems impossible to
translate into a political policy.
_____________________________________________________________
(4) For "work of fiction that every American should read, but
won't,” The City & The City by
China Miéville.
Two societies live right next to and intertwined with each
other, but only physically. Legally, economically, psychologically, and
culturally, they are different. If you live in one city, you cannot look at,
listen to, walk in, or in any way acknowledge the other city, no matter how
close you are physically. Something called "Breach" enforces this completely
mental division and, if you cross the line, you disappear.
Why should every American read this book? It's about
studiously ignoring people in your town that are not like you. It's about
arranging things to favor people like you; you're not against the people not
like you, they are simply not on the radar. Readers in other countries saw this
book as being about
_____________________________________________________________
(5)
For “book about statistics,
baseball, the weather, poker, any many other things”,
The Signal and the Noise by Nate
Silver.
Silver is a statistician who created and writes for the “538”
blog on the New York Times website. This book is part autobiography --
Silver's experiences with baseball and poker -- and part overarching explanation
of the difficulty of forecasting with statistics.
The
topics that he covers span politics, sports (baseball, basketball), games
(chess, poker), natural phenomenon (weather, earthquakes, climate), finance, and
terrorism. It all can get overwhelming, though there are plenty of chapter
breaks. During the chapter on a professional basketball bettor, he diverges into
an introduction on
Bayesian statistical methods. Silver is a strong supporter of Bayesian
methods. While the book is very good, there are some typos, and Silver's tone is
often very glib.
There are extensive citations and notes; they make up about
36% of the Kindle edition.
Coherence: A-. Writing is clear, though the
occasional typo can either confuse or amuse.
Readability: Plenty of short interviews; the
author stays on topics (mostly); clear charts and graphs.
In a Word: Bayes.
In a Phrase: Forecasting is hard.
WHO NEEDS IT: Anyone who tries to
predict the future, scientifically. If you can stomach most of the diverse
topics, you will enjoy it. People who want a more clinical textbook should look
elsewhere.
_____________________________________________________________
(6) For “most detailed insider account of the 2008 financial
meltdown”, On The Brink: Inside the Race to
Stop the Collapse of the Global Financial System by Henry
M. (“Hank”) Paulson.
From May 2006 through January 2009, the reader is taken
through a series of meetings, phone calls, and conversations with large
investment banks, the Fed Chairman, and various politicians. The action moves
very quickly, save for a long autobiographical divergence in Chapter 2. In
between the tense negotiations, Paulson reminds the reader of then-current
headlines, the Dow Jones Industrial average, and consumer sentiment.
To read this book is to relive the 2008 financial crisis,
from the viewpoint of the Secretary of the Treasury. One can better understand
the urgency of the situation. Unfortunately, the big-picture how's and why's are
missing. While learning about “commercial paper” (short-term loans, often used
for payroll), helped illustrate the alarming situation in the autumn of 2008,
one never learns how so many companies, big and small, became dependent on it.
On the other hand, one does learn that Paulson dry-heaves when under great
stress.
Coherence: C-. Easy to get lost in a
blizzard of names, companies, organizations, and financial concepts. Several
passages need re-reading.
Readability: Plenty of office conversations
(lively) but a lack of big-picture introductions (bad). Too many meetings and
phone calls.
In a Word: Educational.
In a Phrase: Insiders Under Pressure.
WHO NEEDS IT: Anyone with a deep
interest in the 2008 financial crisis, especially fans of large companies and
day-to-day DC politicking. Those looking for a big-picture analysis can find
better books.
_____________________________________________________________
(7) For “how things were going before the 2008 economic
crisis”, Coming Apart by
Charles Murray.
The book is strongest when
Coherence: A-. Murray's thesis is conveyed
quickly and simply enough, though it is hard to be alarmed with the prospect of
United States becoming like Sweden or France, as the worst-case scenario. The
reader can easily think of worse scenarios, if the
Readability: The text flows without effort.
One can read this book in a few days. As the number of charts increase, the
paragraph-returns become more numerous. One recognizes all the data, but does
not feel overwhelmed by it.
In a Word: Provocative.
In a Phrase: Do you live in a bubble?
WHO NEEDS IT: If you have college-educated neighbors, and
think that is the norm for the
© 2013, Chris Loyd and ExactingEditor.com
“Reviews by Loyd” will be updated two times per year. Loyd will accept free nonfiction books of recent issuance, too, and would appreciate an e-mail exchange before committing to produce a review here or anywhere else. Publishers, authors and media operatives are encouraged to write CNLoyd@gmail.com. |